> Andrew, > > I noticed that [1] is now in -next but not the MIPS patch [2], not the > MicroBlaze patch [3]. What is the reason for that? If it's only the > lack of an ack, here's mine for the MIPS version: There was no reason other that the missing acks. > > Acked-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thanks for this. Jason - is it possible/best to take this through your tree? Andrew Murray > > Thanks, > > Ralf > > [1] http://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/5218/ > [2] http://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/5217/ > [3] http://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/5216/
