> * Huacai Chen (chenhc@xxxxxxxxxx) [130415 14:49]:
>> The new UEFI-like firmware interface has 3 advantages:
>>
>> 1, Firmware export a physical memory map which is similar to X86's
>> E820 map, so prom_init_memory() will be more elegant that #ifdef
>> clauses can be removed.
>> 2, Firmware export a pci irq routing table, we no longer need pci
>> irq routing fixup in kernel's code.
>> 3, Firmware has a built-in vga bios, and its address is exported,
>> the linux kernel no longer need an embedded blob.
>>
>> With the new interface, Loongson-3A/2G and all their successors can use
>> a unified kernel. All Loongson-based machines support this new interface
>> except 2E/2F series.
>
> Can't we auto-detect whether there is an UEFI-like interface? That
> would allow to reduce the number of #ifdefs a bit.
Cannot be detected at present. In future, all non-UEFI interface will
be replaced and non-UEFI-related code will be removed.
>
>
>> --- a/arch/mips/loongson/common/env.c
>> +++ b/arch/mips/loongson/common/env.c
>> while (l != 0) {
>> - parse_even_earlier(bus_clock, "busclock", l);
>> parse_even_earlier(cpu_clock_freq, "cpuclock", l);
>> parse_even_earlier(memsize, "memsize", l);
>> parse_even_earlier(highmemsize, "highmemsize", l);
>> @@ -57,8 +73,32 @@ void __init prom_init_env(void)
>> }
>> if (memsize == 0)
>> memsize = 256;
>> - if (bus_clock == 0)
>> - bus_clock = 66000000;
>> +#else
>
> why are we not interested anymore in busclock in non-UEFI-like
> machines (and shouldn't this be documented in the summary)?
busclock are not used in any place in the kernel, so remove it.
>
>
>
> Andi
>>
>
