On 05/29, David Daney wrote: > > On 05/29/2013 10:01 AM, James Hogan wrote: >> MIPS has 128 signals, the highest of which has the number 128. The > > I wonder if we should change the ABI and reduce the number of signals to > 127 instead of this patch. Same thoughts... >> @@ -2366,8 +2366,12 @@ relock: >> >> /* >> * Death signals, no core dump. >> + * >> + * MIPS has a signal number 128 which clashes with the core dump >> + * bit. If this was the signal we still want to report a valid >> + * exit code, so round it down to 127. >> */ >> - do_group_exit(info->si_signo); >> + do_group_exit(min(info->si_signo, 127)); This avoids BUG_ON() but obviously fools WIFSIGNALED(), doesn't look very nice. Oleg.
