RE: [PATCH] [RFC] Proposed changes to eliminate 'union mips_instruction' type.

To: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@xxxxxxxxx>, "ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] [RFC] Proposed changes to eliminate 'union mips_instruction' type.
From: "Hill, Steven" <sjhill@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 21:50:10 +0000
Accept-language: en-US
Cc: "linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "cernekee@xxxxxxxxx" <cernekee@xxxxxxxxx>, "kevink@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <kevink@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Daney, David" <David.Daney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <50F6F832.1060807@gmail.com>
Thread-index: AQHN8ud/23VXA8A/UkelDJ80Zymw1ZhLUM8A//+kFDGAAI21gIABVHwA//+plwM=
Thread-topic: [PATCH] [RFC] Proposed changes to eliminate 'union mips_instruction' type.

I will take whatever method everyone chooses. This is the path I need for microMIPS, so I am an agnostic.

References:
- [PATCH] [RFC] Proposed changes to eliminate 'union mips_instruction' type.
  - From: Steven J. Hill
- Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Proposed changes to eliminate 'union mips_instruction' type.
  - From: David Daney
- RE: [PATCH] [RFC] Proposed changes to eliminate 'union mips_instruction' type.
  - From: Hill, Steven
- Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Proposed changes to eliminate 'union mips_instruction' type.
  - From: David Daney
- Re: [PATCH] [RFC] Proposed changes to eliminate 'union mips_instruction' type.
  - From: David Daney