On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 06:58:38PM -0800, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote: > I also think that the > wait_for_completion() based wait in ARM's __cpu_die() can be replaced with a > busy-loop based one, as the wait there in general should be terminated within > few cycles. Why open-code this stuff when we have infrastructure already in the kernel for waiting for stuff to happen? I chose to use the standard infrastructure because its better tested, and avoids having to think about whether we need CPU barriers and such like to ensure that updates are seen in a timely manner. My stance on a lot of this idle/cpu dying code is that much of it can probably be cleaned up and merged into a single common implementation - in which case the use of standard infrastructure for things like waiting for other CPUs do stuff is even more justified.
