From: David Daney <david.daney@xxxxxxxxxx>
At some recent point arch/mips/include/asm/delay.h has started being
included into csrc-octeon.c where the __?delay() functions are
defined. This causes a compile failure due to conflicting
declarations and definitions of the functions.
It turns out that the generic definitions in arch/mips/lib/delay.c also
conflict.
Proposed fix: Declare the functions to take unsigned long parameters
just like asm-generic (and x86) does. Update __delay to agree
(__ndelay and __udelay need no change).
Bonus: Get rid of 'inline' from __delay() definition, as it is globally
visible, and the compiler should be making this decision itself (it
does in fact inline the function without being told to).
Signed-off-by: David Daney <david.daney@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
As seen on linux-next for 20120928
arch/mips/include/asm/delay.h | 6 +++---
arch/mips/lib/delay.c | 6 +++++-
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/delay.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/delay.h
index e7cd782..dc0a5f7 100644
--- a/arch/mips/include/asm/delay.h
+++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/delay.h
@@ -13,9 +13,9 @@
#include <linux/param.h>
-extern void __delay(unsigned int loops);
-extern void __ndelay(unsigned int ns);
-extern void __udelay(unsigned int us);
+extern void __delay(unsigned long loops);
+extern void __ndelay(unsigned long ns);
+extern void __udelay(unsigned long us);
#define ndelay(ns) __ndelay(ns)
#define udelay(us) __udelay(us)
diff --git a/arch/mips/lib/delay.c b/arch/mips/lib/delay.c
index 5995969..dc81ca8 100644
--- a/arch/mips/lib/delay.c
+++ b/arch/mips/lib/delay.c
@@ -15,13 +15,17 @@
#include <asm/compiler.h>
#include <asm/war.h>
-inline void __delay(unsigned int loops)
+void __delay(unsigned long loops)
{
__asm__ __volatile__ (
" .set noreorder \n"
" .align 3 \n"
"1: bnez %0, 1b \n"
+#if __SIZEOF_LONG__ == 4
" subu %0, 1 \n"
+#else
+ " dsubu %0, 1 \n"
+#endif
" .set reorder \n"
: "=r" (loops)
: "0" (loops));
--
1.7.11.4
