On Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 08:28:26PM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > > An empty default block is not allowed so add a ; as empty statement to > > make gcc happy. > > A dummy "break" is the usual solution though. I don't think GCC ever > complains if it sees it unreachable after a "return" -- in a sense it is > just as unreachable as this null instruction is. I wasn't overly picky. Whatever gets the stuff to build correctly. I'm doing one final round of test builds over all -stable branches before dropping most of them like radioctive rocks. But more on that later. Ralf
