* Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 03/22/2012 03:25 PM, Raghavendra K T wrote: > >From: Raghavendra K T<raghavendra.kt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > >Patch simplifies current INLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK. compile tested on x86_64 > > > >Change log: > >get rid of INLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK entirely replacing it with UNINLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK > >instead with the reverse meaning. > > > >whover wants to uninline the spinlocks (like spinlock debugging, paravirt etc > >all just do select UNINLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK > typo: > Whoever wants to uninline the spinlocks (like spinlock debugging, > paravirt etc) just do select UNINLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK. > > > > >Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds<torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >Signed-off-by: Raghavendra K T<raghavendra.kt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >--- > > Please refer : https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/3/21/357 > > Linus, Please let me know if this is what you were looking for or > Did I really mess it up :( Looks sane to me at first sight - will process it once the merge window calms down a bit. Thanks, Ingo
