On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 09:15:39PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote: > >> When flushing TLB, if @vma is backed by huge page, we could flush huge TLB, >> due to that huge page is defined to be far from normal page. >> >> Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton <dhillf@xxxxxxxxx> > > It seems this patch is identical to > https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/2825/ which I've already applied? > Maybe you forget the following message:) btw, I want to change + size = (end - start) >> HPAGE_SHIFT; to + size = (end - start) / HPAGE_SIZE; if it is not too late. Best regards Hillf On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:52 PM, Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 09:09:37PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote: > >> Subject: Flush huge TLB >> From: Hillf Danton <dhillf@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> When flushing TLB, if @vma is backed by huge page, we could flush huge TLB, >> due to that huge page is defined to be far from normal page. >> >> Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton <dhillf@xxxxxxxxx> >> Acked-by: David Daney <david.daney@xxxxxxxxxx> > > I assume this 2nd version was actually meant to be applied, not just for RFC > so I've queued it for 3.3. But you better remove that RFC from subject and > start a fresh mail thread when posting a patch to avoid confusion! > > Thanks, > > Ralf >
