On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 12:24 AM, Deng-Cheng Zhu <dengcheng.zhu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Use this new style (instead of filling in the pci_bus->resource[] array > directly) to hide some ugly implementation details. > > Signed-off-by: Deng-Cheng Zhu <dengcheng.zhu@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/mips/pci/pci.c | 11 +++++++++-- > 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/mips/pci/pci.c b/arch/mips/pci/pci.c > index 33bba7b..7473214 100644 > --- a/arch/mips/pci/pci.c > +++ b/arch/mips/pci/pci.c > @@ -261,6 +261,14 @@ static void pcibios_fixup_device_resources(struct pci_dev *dev, > } > } > > +static void __devinit > +pcibios_setup_root_resources(struct pci_bus *bus, struct pci_controller *ctrl) > +{ > + pci_bus_remove_resources(bus); > + pci_bus_add_resource(bus, ctrl->io_resource, 0); > + pci_bus_add_resource(bus, ctrl->mem_resource, 0); > +} > + > void __devinit pcibios_fixup_bus(struct pci_bus *bus) > { > /* Propagate hose info into the subordinate devices. */ > @@ -270,8 +278,7 @@ void __devinit pcibios_fixup_bus(struct pci_bus *bus) > struct pci_dev *dev = bus->self; > > if (!dev) { > - bus->resource[0] = hose->io_resource; > - bus->resource[1] = hose->mem_resource; > + pcibios_setup_root_resources(bus, hose); > } else if (pci_probe_only && > (dev->class >> 8) == PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_PCI) { > pci_read_bridge_bases(bus); I don't understand this patch. Wouldn't it be enough to have [PATCH 2/3], which adds the pci_create_bus() argument with nobody using it yet, then [PATCH 3/3], which makes mips supply the new argument, and add a hunk to [PATCH 3/3] that completely removes the bus->resource fixups in pcibios_fixup_bus() at the same time? Bjorn