On 08/16/2011 06:54 PM, Yong Zhang wrote:
We can't trust in the caller(userspace) to give signed-extend parameter, thus futex-wait may fail in some special case. For example, if 'val' is too big and bit-31 is 1, the caller may enter endless loop at: futex_wait_setup() { ... if (uval != val) { queue_unlock(q, *hb); ret = -EWOULDBLOCK; ... } Below assembler code will make it more easy to understand how the patch take effect :) Dump of assembler code for function SyS_32_futex: 0xffffffff811b6fe8<+0>: sll a1,a1,0x0 0xffffffff811b6fec<+4>: sll a2,a2,0x0 0xffffffff811b6ff0<+8>: j 0xffffffff8121a240<compat_sys_futex> 0xffffffff811b6ff4<+12>: sll a5,a5,0x0 Signed-off-by: Yong Zhang<yong.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Ralf Baechle<ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- arch/mips/kernel/linux32.c | 7 +++++++ arch/mips/kernel/scall64-n32.S | 2 +- arch/mips/kernel/scall64-o32.S | 2 +- 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
[...]
diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/linux32.c b/arch/mips/kernel/linux32.c index 876a75c..922a554 100644 --- a/arch/mips/kernel/linux32.c +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/linux32.c @@ -349,3 +349,10 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE6(32_fanotify_mark, int, fanotify_fd, unsigned int, flags, return sys_fanotify_mark(fanotify_fd, flags, merge_64(a3, a4), dfd, pathname); } + +SYSCALL_DEFINE6(32_futex, u32 __user *, uaddr, int, op, u32, val, + struct compat_timespec __user *, utime, u32 __user *, uaddr2, + u32, val3) +{ + return compat_sys_futex(uaddr, op, val, utime, uaddr2, val3); +} diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/scall64-n32.S b/arch/mips/kernel/scall64-n32.S index b85842f..c956cc9 100644 --- a/arch/mips/kernel/scall64-n32.S +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/scall64-n32.S @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ EXPORT(sysn32_call_table) PTR sys_fremovexattr PTR sys_tkill PTR sys_ni_syscall - PTR compat_sys_futex + PTR sys_32_futex PTR compat_sys_sched_setaffinity /* 6195 */ PTR compat_sys_sched_getaffinity PTR sys_cacheflush diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/scall64-o32.S b/arch/mips/kernel/scall64-o32.S index 46c4763..f48b18e 100644 --- a/arch/mips/kernel/scall64-o32.S +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/scall64-o32.S @@ -441,7 +441,7 @@ sys_call_table: PTR sys_fremovexattr /* 4235 */ PTR sys_tkill PTR sys_sendfile64 - PTR compat_sys_futex + PTR sys_32_futex
This change is redundant, scall64-o32.S already does the right thing so additional zero extending is not needed and is just extra instructions to execute for no reason.
PTR compat_sys_sched_setaffinity PTR compat_sys_sched_getaffinity /* 4240 */ PTR compat_sys_io_setup
But really I think this patch fixes things at the wrong level. Each architecture potentially needs a similar patch. What would happen if we did something like: diff --git a/kernel/futex_compat.c b/kernel/futex_compat.c index 5f9e689..74ada65 100644 --- a/kernel/futex_compat.c +++ b/kernel/futex_compat.c @@ -180,9 +180,9 @@ err_unlock: return ret; } -asmlinkage long compat_sys_futex(u32 __user *uaddr, int op, u32 val, - struct compat_timespec __user *utime, u32 __user *uaddr2, - u32 val3) +SYSCALL_DEFINE6(compat_sys_futex, u32 __user *, uaddr, int , op, u32, val, + struct compat_timespec __user *, utime, u32 __user *, uaddr2, + u32, val3) { struct timespec ts; ktime_t t, *tp = NULL; Obviously the function name is wrong, but a varient of SYSCALL_DEFINE*() could be created so the proper function names are produced. David Daney