W dniu 6 czerwca 2011 12:32 uÅytkownik George Kashperko <george@xxxxxxxxxxx> napisaÅ: > Hi, > >> Hauke, >> >> My idea for naming schema was to use: >> bcma_host_TYPE_* >> >> Like: >> bcma_host_pci_* >> bcma_host_sdio_* >> >> You are using: >> bcma_host_bcma_* >> >> What do you think about changing this to: >> bcma_host_embedded_* >> or just some: >> bcma_host_emb_* >> ? >> >> Does it make more sense to you? I was trying to keep names in bcma >> really clear, so every first-time-reader can see differences between >> hosts, host and driver, etc. > > how about bcma_host_soc ? We get then inconsistency with "BCMA_HOSTTYPE_EMBEDDED". I'd like to 1) See something like bcma_host_emb... xor 2) Use bcma_host_soc_* and BCMA_HOSTTYPE_SOC -- RafaÅ
