Re: patch to support topdown mmap allocation in MIPS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Good points. I cannot access working system now and will investigate it further tomorrow.

On May 16, 2011, at 6:27 PM, "Kevin Cernekee" <cernekee@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 5:12 PM, David Daney <ddaney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 05/16/2011 02:09 PM, Jian Peng wrote:
>>>  #define COLOUR_ALIGN(addr,pgoff)                              \
>>>        ((((addr) + shm_align_mask)&  ~shm_align_mask) +        \
>>>         (((pgoff)<<  PAGE_SHIFT)&  shm_align_mask))
> 
> I see COLOUR_ALIGN in arch/{arm,mips,sh,sparc} .  All sorts of
> embedded platforms have to worry about cache aliases nowadays.
> 
> Do you think this logic could be folded into the generic
> implementations in mm/mmap.c ?  Or is there something else inside our
> arch_get_unmapped_area* functions that's really, irreparably unique to
> MIPS?
> 
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_32BIT
>>> +       task_size = TASK_SIZE;
>>> +#else /* Must be CONFIG_64BIT*/
>>> +       task_size = test_thread_flag(TIF_32BIT_ADDR) ? TASK_SIZE32 :
>>> TASK_SIZE;
>>> +#endif
> 
> Can the "#else" clause and "task_size" local variable be eliminated?
> TASK_SIZE now performs this check automatically (although that wasn't
> always the case).
> 




[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux