On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 14:10 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > err = event_vfs_getname(result); I really think we should not do this. Events like we have them should be inactive, totally passive entities, only observe but not affect execution (other than the bare minimal time delay introduced by observance). If you want another entity that is more active, please invent a new name for it and create a new subsystem for them, now you could have these active entities also have an (automatic) passive event side, but that's some detail.
