On Wednesday 11 May 2011, Ralf Baechle wrote: > Thanks, queued for 2.6.40. Thanks. > Or does this have any relevance for 2.6.39 or -stable? No need to rush it out, having it in 2.6.40 would be fine. Bye, Maarten
On Wednesday 11 May 2011, Ralf Baechle wrote: > Thanks, queued for 2.6.40. Thanks. > Or does this have any relevance for 2.6.39 or -stable? No need to rush it out, having it in 2.6.40 would be fine. Bye, Maarten
|