On Thu, 24 Mar 2011, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > Hello. > > On 24-03-2011 16:00, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > > > - if (!(desc->status& IRQ_DISABLED)&& desc->chip->unmask) > > > > - desc->chip->unmask(source_irq); > > > > + if (!(desc->status& IRQ_DISABLED)&& chip->irq_unmask) > > > > + chip->irq_unmask(idata); > > > > Hm, doesn't this (I mean the old) code break after the previous patch? > > > Not as long as the compat functions are active in the core. > > I've looked at compat_*() before replying: it seems that they work vice > versa, i.e. the new functions are emulated by calling the old, and you're > moving away from old to new in the previous patch. Maybe I miss something... Oops. Yes. So the patches should be folded
