On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 02:31:49PM -0700, David Daney wrote: > Argh! > > This definitely collides with my Octeon IRQ rewrite, which does the > same thing and more. My patch is pending my cpu_{on,off}line chip > function patch for the IRQ core. I'll drop this patch and put 38/38 on hold for now then. Ralf