Hi, I'm not so familira with uboot, however, I done proprietary booter implementation for my company. Similar functionality was required, for different purposes actually, but it doesn't change the idea. So in my booter code I done simple check of code location. In case when the code detects that it is already in RAM, it skips memory/caches initialization and self coping. Some useful pieces of code: Supporting function. ------CUT-HERE-------- LEAF(set_ra) jr ra nop END(set_ra) ------CUT-HERE-------- Actually the check: ------CUT-HERE-------- bal set_ra /* first get the current program counter */ nop move t0, ra li t1, 0x10000000 and t1, t1, t0 bne zero, t1, 1f /* code in ROM/flash */ nop li s3,0 /* code in RAM */ b 2f nop 1: /* jump to system initialization and code coping routine here */ 2: /* continue normal boot */ ------CUT-HERE-------- I suppose you can do similar in u-boot and it will be quite generic solution. Such code can be executed from RAM and FLASH without need to reconfigure and rebuild. 03.03.11 12:16, Pandurang Kale ÐÐÐÐÑÐÐ(ÐÐ): > Hello Everyone, > > We have MIPS based development board and I am trying to get the uboot up > and running on it. > We have a primary bootloader which check for the valid mod-image stored > on the flash. This mod-image consist of header, uboot and linux kernel. > Depending on the recent, active and stable imagethe primary bootloader > first copies the uboot image. and later on we would copy the kernel > image from uboot. > > But when primary bootloader copies the uboot image to the RAM and passes > the control to the uboot, uboot (MIPS version of start.S and > arch/mips/lib/borad.c) tries to relocate the > already copied image from RAM (the primary bootloader copied it to start > of the RAM+1MB address) to top of the RAM (0x87fc0000) region thinking > that the uboot image is stored in flash. > > All I need to do is skip the uboot relocate code in MIPS version of > uboot startup as the primary bootloader has already relocated the uboot > from Flash to RAM and set up the stack pointer and other global data > appropriately, which it does after relocation. > I can see there is a switch for ARM processor, > CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT, which skips the relocation of uboot code and > tries to run the uboot from RAM. I > cannot see a similar switch implemented for MIPS and didnt find any > related thread anywhere in mailing list or on net. > > Do we have similar ARM like switch to SKIP the RELOCATION? If not has > anyone done this before? > > I would really appreciate if you can guide me to overcome this issue to > run the uboot cleanly skipping the relocation. > > Thanks in advance, > Pandu -- Best regards, RD18-UANIC