On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 1:00 AM, Kevin D. Kissell <kevink@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Would this still be with a "tickful" kernel? I was able to run some > experiments on a Malta over the weekend, using mostly default > Malta defconfig options including tickless operation. The 2.6.32.27 > build comes up with both VPEs and all TCs firing. 2.6.36.2 with > the stackframe.h patch boots all the way up on a single VPE, but > VERY slowly - as if the Clock/Compare setups weren't being done > correctly and timer intervals were waiting the full Count register > rollover cycle. I've been looking at diffs, and merged one change > that was made to cevt-r4k.c into the analogous routine in cevt-smtc.c > (no change), but there's clearly more breakage to the SMTC/Malta > configuration post-2.6.32 than just the stackframe.h patch. Going > tickful may work around it, but tickful+SMTC is grossly inefficient. Yes that is true my configuration is using tickful . I had reported this issue with tickless kernel . I think you missed my last email. I will resend. Thanks Anoop > > Regards, > > Kevin K. > > > > >
