On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 06:18:29PM -0800, David Daney wrote: > On the off chance that uasm ever warns about overflow, there is no way > to know what the offending instruction is. > > Change the printks to WARNs, so we can get a nice stack trace. It has > the added benefit of being much more noticeable than the short single > line warning message, so is less likely to be ignored. Time to interrupt vacation for some patches :-) Queued for 2.6.38. Thanks! Ralf
