[PATCH resend 6/9] MIPS: pfn_valid() is broken on low memory HIGHMEM systems

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



pfn_valid() compares the PFN to max_mapnr:

        __pfn >= min_low_pfn && __pfn < max_mapnr;

On HIGHMEM kernels, highend_pfn is used to set the value of max_mapnr.
Unfortunately, highend_pfn is left at zero if the system does not
actually have enough RAM to reach into the HIGHMEM range.  This causes
pfn_valid() to always return false, and when debug checks are enabled
the kernel will fail catastrophically:

Memory: 22432k/32768k available (2249k kernel code, 10336k reserved, 653k data, 1352k init, 0k highmem)
NR_IRQS:128
kfree_debugcheck: out of range ptr 81c02900h.
Kernel bug detected[#1]:
Cpu 0
$ 0   : 00000000 10008400 00000034 00000000
$ 4   : 8003e160 802a0000 8003e160 00000000
$ 8   : 00000000 0000003e 00000747 00000747
...

On such a configuration, max_low_pfn should be used to set max_mapnr.

This was seen on 2.6.34.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/mips/mm/init.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/mips/mm/init.c b/arch/mips/mm/init.c
index 2efcbd2..18183a4 100644
--- a/arch/mips/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/mips/mm/init.c
@@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ void __init mem_init(void)
 #ifdef CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM
 #error "CONFIG_HIGHMEM and CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM dont work together yet"
 #endif
-	max_mapnr = highend_pfn;
+	max_mapnr = highend_pfn ? : max_low_pfn;
 #else
 	max_mapnr = max_low_pfn;
 #endif
-- 
1.7.0.4




[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux