On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 3:08 PM, David Daney <ddaney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 10/12/2010 11:44 PM, Grant Likely wrote: >> >> This patch refactors the early init parsing of the chosen node so that >> architectures aren't forced to provide an empty implementation of >> early_init_dt_scan_chosen_arch. Instead, if an architecture wants to >> do something different, it can either use a wrapper function around >> early_init_dt_scan_chosen(), or it can replace it altogether. >> >> This patch was written in preparation to adding device tree support to >> both x86 ad MIPS. >> >> Signed-off-by: Grant Likely<grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > In conjunction with my 'MIPS: Add some irq definitins required by OF' and > the '2/2 of/mips: Add device tree support to MIPS' patches, I can enable > CONFIG_USE_OF, and build and run a kernel on my Octeon. I haven't started > using the device tree yet, but this is a good start. > > You can add my... > > Tested-by: David Daney <ddaney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thanks David. I'll add your tags. What do you think Ralf? Should I merge these two patches up for 2.6.37? As mentioned on my other reply, David's "MIPS: add some irq definitions required by OF" patch isn't needed in my current next-devicetree branch. g. > > >> --- >> arch/microblaze/kernel/prom.c | 5 ----- >> arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c | 12 ++++++++++-- >> drivers/of/fdt.c | 2 -- >> include/linux/of_fdt.h | 2 +- >> 4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > [...] > -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
