RE: [PATCH 4/7] pwm: Align existing pwm drivers with pwm-core driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Arun MURTHY wrote:
> >>> mips-jz4740: pwm: Align with new pwm core driver
> >>>
> >>> PWM core driver has been added and has been enabled only for ARM
> >>> platform. The same can be utilised for mips also.
> >>> Please align with the pwm core driver(drivers/pwm-core.c).
> >>
> >> Is there any reason for artificially limiting it to ARM?
> >
> > No not at all, right now I have aligned all existing pwm drivers in
> ARM to make use of the pwm core driver.
> > But faced difficulty in aligning the mips-jz4740 pwm driver, without
> having much knowledge about the device/data sheet.
> > Hence I have let it to the maintainer of that driver to align and
> thereafter this limitation will be removed.
> > Have also comments the same as TODO in the driver.
> >
> 
> Ok, I'll take care of adjusting the jz4740 pwm driver once the pwm-core
> is in proper
> shape.
> But I still think it would be better to have a config symbol which
> would be selected
> by SoC code and on which PWM_CORE would depend. Then it would be
> possible for SoC
> implementation to device whether it wants to provide it's own PWM API
> implementation
> or use pwm-core.

My intention is to make it a generic pwm driver. Like the one we do to register a led class driver / backlight class driver.

> >>
> >> Why can't these changes be in the initial patch which adds pwm-core?
> >>
> > Since by default this driver is enabled, and if there is some other
> pwm driver enabled, both happen to export the same
> function(pwm_enable/pwm_disable,..) After applying the first patch
> build may fail.
> >
> I would understand that if you were just moving code around, but the
> pwm_device
> struct looks completly different now.
Yes, that's the reason, I have modified all the existing pwm drivers except the mips to align with this.
And this looks more generic.
For example the element pwm_id, dev, data in pwm_device are all specific to a device and irrespective of any number of pwm devices each and every device will require this information, hence so.

Thanks and Regards,
Arun R Murthy
-------------



[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux