> On 28 of September 2010 11:38:26 Arun MURTHY wrote: > > > > > > > Why pwm_free is marked __deprecated? What is its successor? > > > > This function is to be removed. > > What should be used as replacement? > No replacement, this function is not required. In the existing scenario, pwm_request will add to the list and pwm_free will remove the driver from list. Not all the pwm drivers register with the pwm core driver and hence pwm core driver maintains a list, wherein it keeps adding the registered pwm drivers to the list. This is removed from the list by unregistering with the core driver. Hence pwm_free is not required. Thanks and Regards, Arun R Murthy -------------
