Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Initialize an atomic_t properly with ATOMIC_INIT(0).

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Initialize an atomic_t properly with ATOMIC_INIT(0).
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 11:06:48 +0100
Cc: linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1002271201230.20373@localhost>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17)

On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 12:02:51PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:

>   AFAIK, the technically correct way to initialize atomic variables is
> with ATOMIC_INIT(n).

Indeed, applied.

Thanks!

  Ralf

References:
- [PATCH] MIPS: Initialize an atomic_t properly with ATOMIC_INIT(0).
  - From: Robert P. J. Day

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Loongson-2F: Flush the branch target history such as BTB and RAS
Next by Date: MIPS raw_local_irq_restore flags
Previous by thread: [PATCH] MIPS: Initialize an atomic_t properly with ATOMIC_INIT(0).
Next by thread: merge .text.*/.rel.text.* sections in module build with -ffunction-section
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux MIPS Home] [LKML Archive] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux] [Git] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCSI] [Linux Hams]

Powered by Linux