On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 16:10 +0100, Maxime Bizon wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 17:49 -0800, David VomLehn wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > if (cpu_has_mips_r2) {
> > - cp0_compare_irq = (read_c0_intctl() >> 29) & 7;
> > - cp0_perfcount_irq = (read_c0_intctl() >> 26) & 7;
> > + cp0_compare_irq_shift = CAUSEB_TI - CAUSEB_IP;
> > + cp0_compare_irq = (read_c0_intctl() >> INTCTLB_IPTI) & 7;
> > + cp0_perfcount_irq = (read_c0_intctl() >> INTCTLB_IPPCI) & 7;
>
> This patch breaks at least bcm63xx, because cp0_compare_irq_shift is not
> initialized when cpu_has_mips_r2 is false.
Yes, that patch have broken the CEVT_R4K support in the archs whose
cpu_has_mips_r2 is false.
I will send a piece of patch to fix it.
Thanks & Regards,
Wu Zhangjin
