Re: [PATCH] MIPS: cleanup switches with cases that can be merged

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: cleanup switches with cases that can be merged
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 01:23:52 +0100
Cc: linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <4B56475F.8070608@xxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17)

On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 12:59:27AM +0100, Roel Kluin wrote:

> I did a search for switch statements with cases that can be merged, but maybe
> some were not intended?
> ---------------->8------------------------------------------8<-----------------
> In these cases the same code was executed.

Queued for 2.6.34.

  Ralf

Follow-Ups:
- 1 GB RAM with RM9000 SOC
  - From: Anoop P.A.

References:
- [PATCH] MIPS: cleanup switches with cases that can be merged
  - From: Roel Kluin

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/2] MIPS: Remove probe_tlb().
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/3] I2C: Add driver for Cavium OCTEON I2C ports.
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: cleanup switches with cases that can be merged
Next by thread: 1 GB RAM with RM9000 SOC
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux MIPS Home] [LKML Archive] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux] [Git] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCSI] [Linux Hams]

Powered by Linux