On 01/04/2010 08:14 AM, Arjan van de Ven wrote: >> Whichever one works but s2c wouldn't require symbol decoding. Maybe >> we can simply add an option to tell it to just parse the oops and >> output it in machine friendly format. Oh, also, the patch does add >> new information the module load addresses. We should be able to add >> those to the oops message in a compact form. > > actually one does not need those; you know the start address of the > function already from the current oops output, and since you know the > address of the function within the module as well, you know the start > address of the module. Right. Thanks for the explanation. -- tejun
