On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 08:34:31PM +0800, Wu Zhangjin wrote: > From: Wu Zhangjin <wuzhangjin@xxxxxxxxx> > > MIPS and some other architectures need this argument to handle > big/little endian respectively. > > Signed-off-by: Wu Zhangjin <wuzj@xxxxxxxxxx> This one is a bit problematic because you seem to have generated the patch against linux-next but I'm applying it on the MIPS -queue tree and some other changes on -next are now resulting in a conflict. And Steven Rostedt is going to merge a few more changes which he says will conflict. So I put this patch on the queue tree but may not propagate it immediately to linux-next. Thanks! Ralf
