Hi, > > > You're ifdefing on Loongson 2F - doesn't that mean that you can't have a > > > kernel that supports both Loongson 2E and 2F? > > > > > > > Currently, not consider it yet;) It's a little hard to cope with, should > > we consider it at this moment? if yes, I will try it with the help of > > exisiting machtype asap. but I think it's better to let it be the future > > job ;) > > Fair enough - though I'm sure Linux distributions would be happy to have > one kernel variant less to ship. > Yup, linux distributions will like it. but just remembered that: the instruciton set of loongson2e and loongson2f is different, -march=loongson2e, -march=loongson2f. so it will be not possible to merge them together, but I will try to merge the 2f support, so please wait for me merging fuloong2f & yeeloon2f, I will do it tonight, it is really an interesting job to do ;) Regards, Wu Zhangjin
