> -----Original Message----- > From: Ralf Baechle [mailto:ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Monday, October 12, 2009 9:18 AM > To: Gandham, Raghu > Cc: Kevin D. Kissell; linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Dearman, Chris > Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/15] Do not rely on the initial state > of TC/VPEbindings when doing cross VPE writes > > On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 02:46:33PM -0700, Gandham, Raghu wrote: > > > > From: Kevin D. Kissell [mailto:kevink@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 9:02 PM > > > To: Gandham, Raghu > > > Cc: linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Dearman, Chris > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/15] Do not rely on the initial state of > > > TC/VPE bindings when doing cross VPE writes > > > > > > Note that, regardless of the reset state, smtc_configure_tlb() > > > should have at least temporarily bound TC 1 to VPE1, which may be > > > why this never seemed to be a problem on the 34K. If one > wants to > > > support designs with more than 2 VPEs, then this is > probably one of > > > the things that needs to be fixed. That having been said, rather > > > than adding a usually-redundant write_vpe_c0_vpeconf0() in that > > > clause, wouldn't it > > be > > > cleaner to just move the MVP setting from the top of the > loop to the > > > point in the loop just after the TCs have been bound to > the VPE in > > > question, i.e., > > > > > > 454 if (slop) { > > > 455 if (tc != 0) { > > > 456 smtc_tc_setup(vpe,tc, cpu); > > > 457 cpu++; > > > 458 } > > > 459 printk(" %d", tc); > > > 460 tc++; > > > 461 slop--; > > > 462 } > > > > > > > write_vpe_c0_vpeconf0(read_vpe_c0_vpeconf0() > > > | VPECONF0_MVP); > > > > > > 463 if (vpe != 0) { > > > 464 /* > > > 465 * Clear any stale software > interrupts > > from > > > VPE's Cause > > > 466 */ > > > > > > This should definitely be OK for a 34K, because it's > being executed > > > by TC0 in VPE0 and the reset state of VPE0 has MVP set. If it > > > weren't, > > > smtc_configure_tlb() would have failed. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Kevin K. > > > > > > I will resend this patch with your suggestion. > > Ping? Don't think I ever received that, if you sent it. I resent the patch and it got checked-in. It is not appended to this mail thread though. http://www.linux-mips.org/git?p=linux.git;a=commitdiff;h=d8e5f9fe5dab0e0 7985f2456cb6cc57788f53131 Thanks, Raghu > > Ralf >
