On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 03:46:35PM +0400, Alexey Zaytsev wrote:
>>> diff --git a/arch/mips/lib/delay.c b/arch/mips/lib/delay.c
>>> index f69c6b5..222bed0 100644
>>> --- a/arch/mips/lib/delay.c
>>> +++ b/arch/mips/lib/delay.c
>>> @@ -51,6 +51,6 @@ void __ndelay(unsigned long ns)
>>> {
>>> unsigned int lpj = current_cpu_data.udelay_val;
>>> - __delay((us * 0x00000005 * HZ * lpj) >> 32);
>>> + __delay((ns * 0x00000005 * HZ * lpj) >> 32);
>>
>> This (and more) is already fixed by the patch posted by Atsushi
>> Nemoto.
> Thanks for noticing. I should really start reading the ml before
> sending any more patches. ;)
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
Obviously it doesn't scan for old patches ;-)
(and why would we believe such a statement sent over an insecure medium
anyway)
There is one open nit in the udelay rewrite which I'm about to fix now.
Cheers,
Ralf
