On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 11:12:48AM +0900, Atsushi Nemoto wrote: > > Relying on pure C for computation of the delay value removes the need for > > explicit. The price we pay is a slight slowdown of the computation - to > > be fixed on another day. > > Please fix this commit. Sigh. I wonder how this wrong version made it into my tree. Oh well, applied. No time to fuzz around before 2.6.30 even though I'd like to avoid the 64-bit arithmetic. Applied. Thanks! Ralf
