On Mon, 18 May 2009 16:33:18 +0100, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 12:25:42AM +0900, Atsushi Nemoto wrote: > > > Thank you for elaboration. Then, this untested patch (on top of the > > last patch) is what you mean? If yes, I will split this into arch > > part and driver part, and then update both patches. > > Partly - I'd also expect to see the resources moved around in the > architecture code so that they are on the platform devices that are > being used to probe the DAIs (unless that's what the architecture side > of your patch was doing, patch wasn't quite giving me enough context to > be 100% clear). Now the resources are provided with "txx9aclc-ac97" platform device which used to probe DAIs. I will send whole patchset again after some testing. > You could also roll the resource requesting and unrequesting into the > probe functions for the DAI & DMA platform devices, though that is not > essential. OK, I will move them into txx9aclc_ac97_dev_probe(). Then I can use devres functions to make the resource management much simpler. --- Atsushi Nemoto
