Wu Zhangjin <wuzhangjin@xxxxxxxxx> writes: Hi, > Dear all, > > I have cleaned up the source code of loongson-based machines support and > updated it to linux-2.6.29.3, the result is put to the following git > repository: > > git://dev.lemote.com/rt4ls.git linux-2.6.29-stable-loongson-to-ralf > > this job is based on the to-mips branch of Yanhua's > git://dev.lemote.com/linux_loongson.git and the lm2e-fixes branch of > Philippe's git://git.linux-cisco.org/linux-mips.git. thanks goes to > them. I'd like to look at your patches but getting a git url prevents me to do this because replying/commenting is not possible. Can you please send patches to the list instead ? > > I have tested it with gcc 4.3 on fuloong(2e), fuloong(2f), yeeloong(2f), > both 32bit and 64bit kernel works well, if you want to try it with gcc > 4.4, please use the patch from attachment. I have some questions/comments : - Why this patch is not merged in your patchset ? - even if it should not affect the kernel, compiling with -march=loongson2f even for 2e (you're matching on loongson2 so 2e and 2f) looks weird. - you're using the -mfix-ls2f-kernel binutils flag but afaik upstream binutils doesn't know it. I really don't know how such a thing should be handled but it seems strange to use this flag before binutils has been patched for it. (the previous comment about -march=loongson2f applies here too) > > * the current source code architecture fwiw, I like this new organisation. thanks. > > $ tree arch/mips/loongson/ > arch/mips/loongson/ > |-- Kconfig > |-- Makefile > |-- common > | |-- Makefile > | |-- bonito-irq.c > | |-- clock.c > | |-- cmdline.c > | |-- cs5536_vsm.c > | |-- early_printk.c > | |-- init.c > | |-- irq.c > | |-- mem.c > | |-- mfgpt.c > | |-- mipsdha.c hm.. I thought that the mipsdha stuff was refused when submitting 2e support. Can someone check ? Arnaud
