Well I replied to the wrong message and screwed up the subject. So Ignore this one and I will send it again properly David Daney David Daney wrote:
The logic used to split the r4000 refill handler is liberally sprinkled with magic numbers. We attempt to explain what they are and normalize them against a new symbolic value (MIPS64_REFILL_INSNS). Changes from v1: Corrected spelling in comment. CC: David VomLehn <dvomlehn@xxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: David Daney <ddaney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Please use this version instead of the original 2/2. arch/mips/mm/tlbex.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/mips/mm/tlbex.c b/arch/mips/mm/tlbex.c index 4dc4f3e..cbc09de 100644 --- a/arch/mips/mm/tlbex.c +++ b/arch/mips/mm/tlbex.c @@ -649,6 +649,14 @@ static void __cpuinit build_update_entries(u32 **p, unsigned int tmp, #endif
