On Tue, 28 Apr 2009, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > This code was validated with all the three ABIs before submission. Does > > your problem happen with vanilla upstream or your locally-modified > > sources? If the latter, then please make sure you've got all the > > necessary updates applied. > > > > I am sorry, I should have said I was using the patch backported to the > 2.9 sources. Indeed, as pointed out by Philippe Vachon, I was missing a > part of the patch. Sorry for the noise. No problem; I suppose my accompanying note about the dependency included with the patch must have been lost in transit. This piece of code is actually generic enough and self-contained it should work as it is or with minimal porting effort for several versions of the library back. Maciej
