Addition of -fwrapv option in 2.6.29 discloses possible overflow with
signed arithmetics. For example, result of "a * 6 / 12" (int a =
400000000) is 200000000 without -fwrapv but -157913941 with -fwrapv.
Change some variable to unsigned to avoid such overflows.
Signed-off-by: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/mips/txx9/generic/setup_tx4927.c | 2 +-
arch/mips/txx9/generic/setup_tx4938.c | 2 +-
arch/mips/txx9/generic/setup_tx4939.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/mips/txx9/generic/setup_tx4927.c b/arch/mips/txx9/generic/setup_tx4927.c
index 778078a..6b681cd 100644
--- a/arch/mips/txx9/generic/setup_tx4927.c
+++ b/arch/mips/txx9/generic/setup_tx4927.c
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ void __init tx4927_setup(void)
{
int i;
__u32 divmode;
- int cpuclk = 0;
+ unsigned int cpuclk = 0;
u64 ccfg;
txx9_reg_res_init(TX4927_REV_PCODE(), TX4927_REG_BASE,
diff --git a/arch/mips/txx9/generic/setup_tx4938.c b/arch/mips/txx9/generic/setup_tx4938.c
index 5d2cbbf..b2b8529 100644
--- a/arch/mips/txx9/generic/setup_tx4938.c
+++ b/arch/mips/txx9/generic/setup_tx4938.c
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ void __init tx4938_setup(void)
{
int i;
__u32 divmode;
- int cpuclk = 0;
+ unsigned int cpuclk = 0;
u64 ccfg;
txx9_reg_res_init(TX4938_REV_PCODE(), TX4938_REG_BASE,
diff --git a/arch/mips/txx9/generic/setup_tx4939.c b/arch/mips/txx9/generic/setup_tx4939.c
index d48eee1..f0beba8 100644
--- a/arch/mips/txx9/generic/setup_tx4939.c
+++ b/arch/mips/txx9/generic/setup_tx4939.c
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ void __init tx4939_setup(void)
int i;
__u32 divmode;
__u64 pcfg;
- int cpuclk = 0;
+ unsigned int cpuclk = 0;
txx9_reg_res_init(TX4939_REV_PCODE(), TX4939_REG_BASE,
TX4939_REG_SIZE);
--
1.5.6.3
