On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 7:09 PM, Daniel James Laird <daniel.j.laird@xxxxxxx> wrote: > I cant find the file you are talking about however Sorry, I misspelled the file name. It's 'drivers/serial/pnx8xxx_uart.c' instead. > I think that the major number should infact be 4 with a minor number of 64,65,66 etc. This seems to be what other devices do. This would mean you can still be ttyS... but not clash with SA1100 if that's what you mean. You're wrong. There are lots of board specific serial drivers that define special major-minor numbers. For example look at sc26xx, mpc52xx_uart, bfin_5xx drivers. The problem with pnx8xxx_uart driver is that it uses special major:minor numbers for generic ttyS* devices. I think we need one of these changes: 1) make a special CONFIG_PNX8XXX_UART_TTYS option for switching between ttyS*+4:64 and ttySA*+204:5 variants (see f.e. atmel_serial driver). Of course this CONFIG_PNX8XXX_UART_TTYS option will be disabled if CONFIG_SERIAL_8250 enabled. 2) Just stick with ttySA*+204:5 (not with ttyS*+204:5 as it's now). Please tell me what you prefer and I'll send you a patch. > > With regards, > Daniel Laird > > Daniel Laird, Software Engineer > NXP Semiconductors, BU Home, BL STB > > -----Original Message----- > From: linux-mips-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-mips-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ihar Hrachyshka > Sent: 2009 Jan 13 15:08 > To: linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [pnx833x_port]: device name prefix - ttyS or ttySA? > > In 'drivers/serial/pnx833x_port.c' we define the prefix for UART serial > device as "ttyS". Anyway, we use major:minor numbers for SA1100 serial > driver (that are 204:5). Why don't we use "ttySA" prefix then? That's > what different embedded build systems expect for populating /dev (f.e. > buildroot). > > >
