Re: [PATCH] cpumask fallout: Initialize irq_default_affinity earlier.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: David Daney <ddaney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpumask fallout: Initialize irq_default_affinity earlier.
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 12:56:59 -0800 (PST)
Cc: rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <496666CE.3050205@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23)


On Thu, 8 Jan 2009, David Daney wrote:
> 
> The 'inline' seems gratuitous to me.  Since it is static GCC should do 
> the Right Thing.  However since you suggested it, I am testing it that 
> way.

Trust me, gcc very seldom does the Right Thing(tm) when it comes to 
inlining. 

			Linus

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] cpumask fallout: Initialize irq_default_affinity earlier.
  - From: Rusty Russell

References:
- [PATCH] cpumask fallout: Initialize irq_default_affinity earlier.
  - From: David Daney
- Re: [PATCH] cpumask fallout: Initialize irq_default_affinity earlier.
  - From: Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] cpumask fallout: Initialize irq_default_affinity earlier.
  - From: David Daney

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] cpumask fallout: Initialize irq_default_affinity earlier.
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] cpumask fallout: Initialize irq_default_affinity earlier.
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] cpumask fallout: Initialize irq_default_affinity earlier.
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] cpumask fallout: Initialize irq_default_affinity earlier.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux MIPS Home] [LKML Archive] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux] [Git] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCSI] [Linux Hams]

Powered by Linux