Ralf Baechle wrote:
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 11:36:54AM +1100, Nick Andrew wrote:
From: Nick Andrew <nick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 11:36:54 +1100
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx>, "Kevin D. Kissell" <kevink@xxxxxxxx>,
Lucas Woods <woodzy@xxxxxxxxx>, Nick Andrew <nick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Fix incorrect use of loose in vpe.c
Fix incorrect use of loose in vpe.c
From: Nick Andrew <nick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
It should be 'lose', not 'loose'.
Signed-off-by: Nick Andrew <nick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks, applied. Note that the address you used for Kevin Kissel to post
your patch is no longer valid.
Yeah, but I'm still on the mailing list, so I saw it. I don't "own"
that particular module,
but for whatever it's worth, I'm OK with fixing the comment - though I'm
surprised
that checkpatch let a non-canonical multi-line comment block like that
go by. ;o)
Regards,
Kevin K.
