Andrew Randrianasulu wrote: > Hello. Sorry for asking this question - but while trying to move > forward this patch, i faced with duplicated opcode in > opcodes/mips-ops.c One "vmulu" was defined for Octeon, and one - > for SGI O2 VICE coprocessor. After commenting out one from Octeon > - my [patched] binutils finally was able to pass gcc-3.4.6 compilation. > I saw some duplicates in this file, apart from my case, but i'm > really unsure what to do in this case? Move patch parts around? > But moving them in random order will break assembler, already learned > this .... > > Also I'm lost in gas/config/tc-mips.c Original patch was designed for > (K, m, n) [i don't know what they mean .. some form of internal > markers?] Exactly that, their meaning is documented in include/opcode/mips.h > and i changed it for (+K, +m,+n). But i'm really lost in those big > switches there. Right now my new code disabled, looking at old patch > i must add some logic before yet another switch. Where is the best > place for discussing this - here or on gcc mail list? Use binutils@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Thiemo
