The flush_cache_all() is empty, but it is still called by some function? And what's the difference between flush_cache_all() and __flush_cache_all()?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: The flush_cache_all() is empty, but it is still called by some function? And what's the difference between flush_cache_all() and __flush_cache_all()?
- From: "Lennox Wu" <lennox.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 17:44:40 +0800
Hi,
I traced the cache operations of R3000 and R4000 (the Kernel version is 2.6.27).
I found the flush_cache_all() is empty, but it is still called by some function, e.g. remap_area_pages() .
I don't understand why the function is empty and what's the difference between flush_cache_all() and
__flush_cache_all(). Does calling a empty flush_cache_all() make some problem ?
Thanks,
Lennox
[Index of Archives]
[Linux MIPS Home]
[LKML Archive]
[Linux ARM Kernel]
[Linux ARM]
[Linux]
[Git]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux Hams]