On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 06:46:21PM +0400, Dmitri Vorobiev wrote: > > What is the Linux-mips' team preference for feeding this patch to > > Linus? This technically isn't a regression, since it was broken in > > 2.6.25, but it would be nice to get this to Linus sooner rather than > > later. Should I push it with a batch of ext4 fixes, or do you want to > > push it via the mips tree? (Davem asked me to push the sparc export > > via ext4, while the ppc arch, it went via the ppc tree. So whichever > > is your preference; I'm easy. :-) > > > > - Ted > > Hi Ted, > > Normally I push my patches via the mips tree, and now I'm Cc:ing Ralf for that. > > Hopefully Ralf will react quickly. :) I prefer to do it myself so I can apply it at the same time to the MIPS -stable branches. I'm a little irriated that this thread seems to be only about empty_zero_page but apparently not zero_page_mask? empty_zero_page is actualy an array of pages on MIPS and ZERO_PAGE() will pick the right one for a particular user space mapping based on the virtual address but ZERO_PAGE() also references zero_page_mask. So I sense more brokenness here. Ralf
