On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 02:19:03AM +0200, Matteo Croce wrote:
> > @@ -371,12 +371,20 @@ static int __vlynq_enable_device(struct
> >
> > switch (dev->divisor) {
> > case vlynq_div_auto:
> > - /* Only try locally supplied clock, others cause problems */
> > +
> > + vlynq_reg_write(dev->local->control, 0);
> > vlynq_reg_write(dev->remote->control, 0);
> > + if (vlynq_linked(dev)) {
> > + printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: using external clock\n",
> > + dev->dev.bus_id);
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > +
> > for (i = vlynq_ldiv2; i <= vlynq_ldiv8; i++) {
> > vlynq_reg_write(dev->local->control,
> > VLYNQ_CTRL_CLOCK_INT |
> > VLYNQ_CTRL_CLOCK_DIV(i - vlynq_ldiv1));
> > + vlynq_reg_write(dev->remote->control, 0);
> > if (vlynq_linked(dev)) {
> > printk(KERN_DEBUG
> > "%s: using local clock divisor %d\n",
> >
> > Flo
>
> isn't this what I do in my last patch?
I was shoveling through my inbox top down and the first mail was the
original patch i was referring to - sorry for the noise...
Flo
--
Florian Lohoff flo@xxxxxxxxxx +49-171-2280134
Those who would give up a little freedom to get a little
security shall soon have neither - Benjamin Franklin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
