On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 10:07:38PM +0100, peter fuerst wrote: > > is there a reason to restrict this to IP28 only ? > > Would indeed be most surprising, if this isn't appropriate for any Indigo2- > Impact, but don't know for sure. And can't check, whether it at least doesn't > hurt Non-Impact Indigo2. Of course, being able to avoid '#ifdef' at all would > be the prettiest alternative. I'll check my IP22 machines, if they are ok with that change. Another solution could be to have gio_set_master() similair to pci_set_master(). That way we only enable master, if it is requested by a driver. Thomas. -- Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessary a good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
