On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 02:18:28PM +0000, Ralf Baechle wrote: > On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 09:05:42AM +0100, Giuseppe Sacco wrote: > > > The patch you proposed, that use a larger buffer, does not seems to > > trigger the bug. > > It may help but doesn't have a chance to be accepted upstream. So > this is no more than an useful litmus test. sure, that's why I called it a hack. It was just to make sure, that I'm on the right track. Thomas. -- Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessary a good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
