Re: [RFC] Add __initbss section

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Add __initbss section
From: Franck Bui-Huu <vagabon.xyz@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 10:33:50 +0200
Cc: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-mips <linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20071015160109.GA11048@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (X11/20070719)

Ralf Baechle wrote:
> As I recall the argumentation was they should go there because that section
> can be marked no-exec.

Are these switch tables really different from ELF .plt or .got ?

		Franck

References:
- [RFC] Add __initbss section
  - From: Franck Bui-Huu
- Re: [RFC] Add __initbss section
  - From: Ralf Baechle
- Re: [RFC] Add __initbss section
  - From: Franck Bui-Huu
- Re: [RFC] Add __initbss section
  - From: Ralf Baechle

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] mm/pg-r4k.c: Dump the generated code
Next by Date: Re: [RFC] Add __initbss section
Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] Add __initbss section
Next by thread: Re: [RFC] Add __initbss section
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux MIPS Home] [LKML Archive] [Linux ARM Kernel] [Linux ARM] [Linux] [Git] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCSI] [Linux Hams]

Powered by Linux