Re: Suspicious test in dma-default.c

[Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 11:03:14AM +0200, Maxime Bizon wrote:

> I don't know exactly why cpu_is_noncoherent_r10000() is needed, but the
> test looks wrong:
> 
> 	return !plat_device_is_coherent(dev) &&
> 	       (current_cpu_data.cputype == CPU_R10000 &&
> 	       current_cpu_data.cputype == CPU_R12000);

I guess a processor need to be quite shizophrenic to pass this test ;-)

Patch applied, thanks.

  Ralf