Alchemy DMA and GFP_DMA

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



arch/mips/au1000/common/dbdma.c uses GFP_DMA in two places and I think
both instances are uncessary.  Could some alchmist confirm that both are
unnecessary?

Thanks,

  Ralf

Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/arch/mips/au1000/common/dbdma.c b/arch/mips/au1000/common/dbdma.c
index 626de44..708b83b 100644
--- a/arch/mips/au1000/common/dbdma.c
+++ b/arch/mips/au1000/common/dbdma.c
@@ -397,7 +397,7 @@ au1xxx_dbdma_ring_alloc(u32 chanid, int entries)
 	 * slabs of memory.
 	 */
 	desc_base = (u32)kmalloc(entries * sizeof(au1x_ddma_desc_t),
-			GFP_KERNEL|GFP_DMA);
+			GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (desc_base == 0)
 		return 0;
 
@@ -408,7 +408,7 @@ au1xxx_dbdma_ring_alloc(u32 chanid, int entries)
 		kfree((const void *)desc_base);
 		i = entries * sizeof(au1x_ddma_desc_t);
 		i += (sizeof(au1x_ddma_desc_t) - 1);
-		if ((desc_base = (u32)kmalloc(i, GFP_KERNEL|GFP_DMA)) == 0)
+		if ((desc_base = (u32)kmalloc(i, GFP_KERNEL)) == 0)
 			return 0;
 
 		desc_base = ALIGN_ADDR(desc_base, sizeof(au1x_ddma_desc_t));


[Index of Archives]     [Linux MIPS Home]     [LKML Archive]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux]     [Git]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux